SELECTED WORK

Five engagements, and what actually changed.

THE ENGAGEMENTS

Different companies, the same shape of problem.

Four of these arrived as a tooling problem. In every one of them the tool turned out to be the smaller half. The fifth had no tooling and no process at all.

01 / HUBSPOT IMPLEMENTATION, THREE TEAMS

A national travel center operator

80+ travel centers, 180+ quick service restaurants, 30+ convenience stores

The situation

The fleet sales team was managing deals in spreadsheets. That holds up until the business is large enough that no two people track the same thing the same way, and by then management has no view at all.

What we did

Moved fleet sales off spreadsheets into HubSpot with a formal sales process: stages, forecasting and consistent deal tracking

Added e-signature, so contracts close inside the system instead of beside it

Extended HubSpot to the due diligence and licensing teams once fleet sales was live

Built automation on top of the structure, so steps that used to depend on someone remembering now happen on their own

What changed

One team was fixed first. It worked, and the company chose to bring two more teams onto the same system. Tracking, forecasting and management insight now cover all three, and items stop falling through the gaps between them.

02 / PIPEDRIVE TO HUBSPOT MIGRATION

An environmental data and land stewardship company

Monitoring and stewardship software for contaminated and sensitive land

The situation

They were on Pipedrive and getting very little out of it. Part of that was enablement, the team had never properly been brought onto the platform. The rest was a real gap: they needed revenue tracking and customer sentiment the tool could not give them.

What we did

Stood up HubSpot, with adoption as the deliverable rather than the migration itself

Separated new business from renewals and upsells, so each team prioritizes by deal type instead of working one undifferentiated list

Added rigor to pipeline definitions and new business tracking

Implemented customer success metrics and the mechanisms to act on them, so at risk accounts surface early enough to do something about

What changed

The obvious read on this one is that they switched CRMs. Switching was the smaller half. A team that got no value from the old tool would have got none from the new one either, if the same undifferentiated pipeline had simply been rebuilt inside it.

03 / CRM REMEDIATION

A SaaS platform serving the restoration industry

Emergency response planning software sold to commercial property clients

The situation

They already had a CRM. It was messy, and a messy CRM is worse than no CRM: the team stops trusting it and quietly goes back to working out of their heads, while you keep paying for the seats.

What we did

Brought the existing instance to a steady state rather than replacing it

Established formal sales stages with explicit entrance and exit criteria, so a deal moves because something happened rather than because a rep felt optimistic

Built forecasting on top of stages that finally meant something

What changed

Better adoption, faster onboarding for new users, and pipeline management the team actually uses. Worth saying plainly, because it is unusual for an agency to say it: the answer here was not a new platform.

04 / SALESFORCE, DATA AND OUTBOUND

An AI and automation platform for transportation and logistics

Back office automation and driver lifecycle software, in market 50+ years

The situation

The engagement started as an enrichment integration cleanup. The enrichment tool was creating duplicate contacts and making a real mess of Salesforce. That is the standard failure mode: data lands in the CRM faster than anyone has agreed what the fields mean, and inside a quarter nobody trusts a record they did not personally touch.

What we did

Fixed the broken integration and cleaned up the duplicate contacts in Salesforce

Cleaned up Salesforce itself once that first phase proved out

Put a formal sales process in place with real pipeline management

Rebuilt lead flow tracking with a proper lead scoring system, so the team could tell a name from a buyer

Automated lead follow up with sequencing, covering both inbound follow up and cold outbound

What changed

The presenting problem was duplicate records. The real problem was that no process existed for the data to support, which is why the duplicates kept coming back. Clean first, then process, then scoring, then outbound. The order is the point, and this engagement ran the whole length of it.

05 / RETAINER GTM AND REVOPS

A family law and civil appeals practice

Startup legal practice, no CRM and no defined process at the outset

The situation

Not a broken system to fix. Nothing at all: no CRM, no defined sales process, and no way to tell where a matter came from or why it closed.

What we did

Operated as their GTM and RevOps function on retainer, so strategy and execution stayed in one place

Stood up a CRM and a legal matter management system, integrated with their lead source systems

Built the sales process from scratch, including the full lead to close motion

What changed

They graduated. The retainer ended because the revenue system runs without us, and a client who no longer needs you is the outcome we are actually selling.

READY TO TALK

Tell us where revenue is leaking. We’ll tell you what to fix first.

30 minute intro. No deck, no pitch. We map the gap between your motion and your system. You decide what to do with it.

Book your 30-min intro →
CORNERSTONE
REVOPS · CONSULTING
We install the revenue motion. The CRM is just the surface it runs on.

SERVICES

COMPANY

CONTACT

© 2026 Cornerstone RevOps Consulting, LLC. All rights reserved.
Privacy PolicyTerms of Service